Wanted: Team of farming ‘myth-busters’

BRITISH agriculture urgently needs a “rapid rebuttal” team to counter anti-farming messages pedalled by activists.

Bad news travels faster than ever these days, spurred on at the click of a mouse by social media websites like Twitter and Facebook.

Opinions about agriculture – even when poorly informed – are no longer confined to a minority. As a result, farmers risk being engulfed by a tidal wave of anti-farming propaganda.

Speed is of the essence when countering misinformation.

In the USA, farm groups have joined forces in a multi-million dollar campaign to response to attacks by activists (Financial Times – registration required).

With 50 affiliates, the US campaign will spend up to $30m a year to promote a positive farming message.

Until now, US farmers have been overly defensive and slow to respond to their critics, says Bob Stallman, of the American Farm Bureau Federation.

“We realised that we have not been part of the conversation and we realise that is a mistake,” he concedes.

It’s the same in Britain. Farmers have been caught on the hop over a host of issues ranging from “mega-farms” to GM crops and livestock cloning.

Now plans for a badger cull to combat bovine tuberculosis are at the centre of a social media storm. Thousands of animal welfare supporters have signed anti-cull petitions and posted their objections on websites.

This time, industry leaders have hit back, urging farmers to post messages online explaining why a badger cull is necessary. They have also launched a TB Free England website, promoting the arguments in favour of a cull.

Battles like these will come thick and fast over the coming years.

Issues like high food prices, subsidy reform and the impact of farming on the environment will all see agriculture increasingly thrust into the limelight.

Rapid rebuttal of misinformation will become ever more important.

Without it, farmers will find themselves increasingly on the back foot when trying to get their message across.

2 Comments

  1. Agree with this though must avoid ‘firing from the hip’ on single issues. Great care must go into responding without insulting or ramming home an education to the misinformed.
    A greater understanding is required of the 90% urban UK population all shopping at supermarkets, disconnected from the issues, not liking the ideas of GM, pesticides, dead animals, nature red in tooth or claw but yet demanding cheap food and lovely looking countryside.
    Proactive but realistic illumination is now required with more subtlety than perhaps previously employed.

  2. Johann

    Yes I think we need this but this is crisis management, what we need and have is organisations that continually promote all positive, honest aspects of modern farming and debate the pros and cons of the changes that take place including more efficient production, CAP reform etc.

    LEAF is just one of the organisations that do this, we can’t just wait until the issue comes about, we need to plan in advance of the changes and incorporate the messages into the media campaign before the activists get going.

Comments are closed.

© 2018 Johann Tasker

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

%d bloggers like this: